The New Civil Rights Battle: The Struggle to Implement Amendment #4

March 18, 2020

The New Civil Rights Battle:
The Struggle to Implement Amendment #4

by Dr. Linda Geller-Schwartz

This is a story about equality, about justice and, ultimately, about democracy.    It is about the historic struggle to create the kind of nation that America professes to be.  But, as frequently happens, those with power have made every effort to bend the moral arc of the universe, in Martin Luther King’s Jr. famous statement, away from justice – not towards it.

On Tuesday, November 6, 2018, close to 65% of voters approved an amendment to the Florida Constitution to restore voting rights to approximately 1.4 million people who had committed a felony and been disenfranchised, possibly for life.  As Howard Simon, Executive Director of the ACLU proclaimed at the time: “This is transformative in Florida…We will no longer have second class citizens.”   For the thousands of volunteers, who had worked hard to have Amendment #4 passed, this was a night of euphoria.  The people had spoken with a strong bi-partisan voice in favor of correcting one of the major injustices in Florida.  Little did we know what was to come. 

To tell this story, it is necessary to provide some context.

History of Disenfranchisement 

South Florida residents, a significant number of whom are Northeastern transplants, do not regard Florida as a southern state with a shameful history of slavery and a role as a founding member of the Confederate states.  They just see Florida as New York state, without the snow. However, Florida’s Constitution and politics are very much shaped by the injustices of Reconstruction and the Jim Crow period.

After the Civil War, the U.S. Congress passed the Reconstruction Amendments: The 13th Amendment which emancipated the slaves, the 14th Amendment which granted equal citizenship to freed slaves, and the 15th Amendment which prohibited denial of the right to vote based on “race, color or previous condition of servitude”.   Florida, along with nine other Confederate states rejected the 14th Amendment in 1866.  The following year, Congress passed the Reconstruction Act which required each state to extend voting rights to all males, regardless of race.

Click here to view the full article.

About the Author

Linda Geller Schwartz, Ph.D.

Linda Geller Schwartz, Ph.D.

Board Member

Linda Geller Schwartz is a former adjunct professor at Florida Atlantic University in the Women’s Studies Center and the Department of Sociology. Her principal areas of focus were problems facing women in the workplace, including sexual harassment and occupational sex segregation. Linda was also the director general of the Women’s Bureau in the Federal Department of Labor in Canada, and a senior policy advisor in the government.

Related Articles

The Power of Anti-Zionism in the United States: A Gradual Hegemony Building

Building on Antonio Gramsci’s framework, this paper analyzes the hegemonic
consolidation that has led to the emergence of a strong anti-Zionist historic bloc.
It reinterprets the notion of a historic bloc not through the traditional Marxist
perspective of class hegemony, but rather through the prevalence of a resolute
Palestinian narrative.

When Academic Freedom Becomes Weaponised: The Normalisation of Antisemitic Expression in British Academia

Amira Halperin and Stephen Sussman argue that institutional neutrality within universities can function as a mechanism of avoidance, and how legal protections for speech are being invoked to justify inaction.

In the wake of the 7 October 2023 Hamas attacks against Israel, university campuses across Britain have become sites of intense conflict over Israel, Gaza, Zionism, and antisemitism. Campus protests and confrontations have raised difficult questions about the boundaries between protected political expression and conduct that intimidates, excludes, or discriminates against Jewish and Israeli students and faculty.

The Strait of Hormuz Crisis and the Limits of Iranian Coercion

With the 60-day U.S.-Iran negotiating period now expired and the two sides still far apart, the Strait of Hormuz remains at the center of the confrontation. Traffic through one of the world’s most important energy corridors remains a fraction of prewar levels, while Washington and Tehran continue to disagree fundamentally over the terms under which normal navigation would resume. The immediate dispute raises a larger strategic question: can Tehran use control over a critical international waterway to compel a change in American strategy?

[fts_twitter twitter_name=@pbdemocracy tweets_count=6 cover_photo=yes stats_bar=no show_retweets=no show_replies=no]

The Center is a gathering of scholars, experts and community stakeholders, that engage in research and dialogue in an effort to create practical policy recommendations and solutions to current local, national, and international challenges.

©2025 The Palm Beach Center for Democracy and Policy Research. All Rights Reserved