Reciprocity, Fairness Must Guide Israel, West’s Mideast Strategy
Image by Muhammad Ishaq/Dreamstime.com
Reciprocity, Fairness Must Guide Israel, West’s Mideast Strategy
By Luis Fleischman
From: www.newsmax.com
President Joe Biden, along with the leaders of Great Britain, France, and Germany, recently rallied around Israel when Iran attacked it.
Such support constituted an inflection point, given Biden’s harsh criticism of Israel’s conduct in the war in Gaza.
Israel successfully protected its citizens from Iranian ballistic and cruise missiles and drones with air-defense technology that the United States and Israel developed together.
Likewise, the actions of the United States, Great Britain, and even Jordan in intercepting Iranian missiles and drones are particularly significant.
Indeed, there is a geopolitical reality that both President Trump and Biden have sought, which is an alliance between Israel and moderate Sunni Arab states, including Egypt, the Persian Gulf countries, and Saudi Arabia.
These countries provided intelligence and even intercepted some of the drones directed against Israel. They are categorically willing to counteract Iran’s threat.
As the late President Richard Nixon learned half a century ago, Israel is a strategic asset.
The Biden administration should explain this to the public.
Joe Biden should refrain from allowing his concern about the Dearborn, Michigan, and progressive voters to determine American strategic interest.
Israel, for now, should not retaliate against Iran.
However, Iran conducted its bombardment of Israel’s territory using lethal weapons that, without aerial defenses, would have caused massive destruction.
Therefore, it’s not difficult to imagine that if Iran develops a nuclear weapon, it may well use it. Thus, Israel has the right and the obligation to destroy Iran’s nuclear program.
Israel should concentrate now on destroying Hamas by entering Rafah and dismantling the last four Hamas battalions.
Likewise, it should ensure Hezbollah retreats to 10 Kilometers North of the Litani River as stipulated in the 2006 Resolution 1701.
Biden should no longer object to the Rafah Operation if Israel provides a corridor to allow the civil population passage to safety and secures massive humanitarian aid.
Israel’s aerial defense proved that the Iran-made missiles and drones used by Russia against Ukraine have limits and are no match to American Israeli capabilities. Ukraine is a victim of similar attacks from Russia.
Now that a coalition of Western countries stood by Israel, the latter must retribute by committing to support NATO’s efforts to defend Ukraine.
Since the Oct. 7, 2023 attacks, Russia has chosen to side with Hamas over Israel.
Israel has maintained neutrality in the Russian war on Ukraine out of concern about the deconfliction agreement on Syrian soil it has with Russia.
Given that Israel now attacks Iranian targets in Syria without coordinating them with Russia, that agreement with Russia is irrelevant.
Thus, it’s time for Israel to support Ukraine unequivocally. Israel’s recent experience with the Iranian attack can benefit Ukraine, the European Union, and NATO.
However, Western countries should be kinder to Israel.
It’s inconceivable that a liberal democracy like Canada imposed an arms embargo on another liberal democracy like Israel in the middle of a just war against an evil enemy.
The same applies to Ireland, Spain, and Belgium, whose accusations against Israel have no basis and play in Hamas’ hands.
Israel and the West are natural strategic partners, but the relationship must be reciprocal and fair.
About the Author
Luis Fleischman
CO-FOUNDER, CONTRIBUTOR AND BOARD MEMBER
Luis Fleischman, Ph.D is a professor of Sociology at Palm Beach State College. He served as Vice-President of the Jewish Community Relations Council of the Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County, and as a Latin America expert at the Washington DC –Menges Hemispheric Project (Center for Security Policy)
Related Articles
The Power of Anti-Zionism in the United States: A Gradual Hegemony Building
Building on Antonio Gramsci’s framework, this paper analyzes the hegemonic
consolidation that has led to the emergence of a strong anti-Zionist historic bloc.
It reinterprets the notion of a historic bloc not through the traditional Marxist
perspective of class hegemony, but rather through the prevalence of a resolute
Palestinian narrative.
When Academic Freedom Becomes Weaponised: The Normalisation of Antisemitic Expression in British Academia
Amira Halperin and Stephen Sussman argue that institutional neutrality within universities can function as a mechanism of avoidance, and how legal protections for speech are being invoked to justify inaction.
In the wake of the 7 October 2023 Hamas attacks against Israel, university campuses across Britain have become sites of intense conflict over Israel, Gaza, Zionism, and antisemitism. Campus protests and confrontations have raised difficult questions about the boundaries between protected political expression and conduct that intimidates, excludes, or discriminates against Jewish and Israeli students and faculty.
The Strait of Hormuz Crisis and the Limits of Iranian Coercion
With the 60-day U.S.-Iran negotiating period now expired and the two sides still far apart, the Strait of Hormuz remains at the center of the confrontation. Traffic through one of the world’s most important energy corridors remains a fraction of prewar levels, while Washington and Tehran continue to disagree fundamentally over the terms under which normal navigation would resume. The immediate dispute raises a larger strategic question: can Tehran use control over a critical international waterway to compel a change in American strategy?
The Center is a gathering of scholars, experts and community stakeholders, that engage in research and dialogue in an effort to create practical policy recommendations and solutions to current local, national, and international challenges.
EXPLORE THE CENTER
FOCUS AREAS
©2025 The Palm Beach Center for Democracy and Policy Research. All Rights Reserved