The Wagner Group Crisis and Its Impact on Latin America
The Wagner Group Crisis and Its Impact on Latin America
By Luis Fleischman
The Madrid-based NGO Prisoners Defenders reported that the Cuban and Russian governments signed an agreement in which Cuba would send soldiers to join the war in Ukraine. Such an event raises many important questions.
The Wagner Group’s dramatic failed mutiny displayed something the Kremlin knew long ago; the group, particularly its leader Yevgeny Prighozin, has become a problem for Russia, particularly on the Ukrainian front.
The group had little military training and served as cannon fodder in the war. Thousands of its fighters fell in battle. The group was convenient to Russia as it sacrificed many criminals whose lives were expendable, and it prevented a crisis of internal legitimacy.
Likewise, the group has played an essential role in various parts of the world, where its operations are tied to the Russian military and intelligence community. The group has provided security services and paramilitary assistance and launched disinformation campaigns for regimes and political groups in Sudan, the Central African Republic, Mozambique, Mali, Libya, Syria, and Venezuela.
The group’s usefulness explains Putin’s restraint towards Prighozin, who has been a harsh critique of the Russian military establishment and, more ominously to Putin, the rationale for the war in Ukraine itself.
As Prighozin’s hostility towards the military has increased, the Putin regime shas ought alternatives to the Wagner group, which has become more of a threat than an asset. Indeed, the Ministry of Defence planned to disband the Wagner group by July 1st. It is again this background that we can understand Russia’s recruitment of Cuban soldiers.
According to Prisoners Defenders, Russia would pay every soldier $2,000 monthly, but the Cuban government would take 75% to 95% of such income. The report also claims that these soldiers have no choice but to join Russian troops. Otherwise, they would be subjected to retaliation and punishment.
Of course, this is not the first time Cuban soldiers have been activated. They were involved In wars in Angola, Ethiopia, Congo, Algeria, Iraq, and Syria. In Africa alone, Cuba is estimated to have lost 5,000 soldiers.
It is reasonable to assume that Cuban casualties will be significantly higher in the current war, as they are likely to have the same status as Wagner’s recruited prisoners.
The Cuban government would benefit economically from such a deal, and the Russians would begin to reduce their dependence on the Wagner Group.
In addition, it would strengthen the alliance between Russia and left-wing Latin American regimes, such as Maduro’s Venezuela, Ortega’s Nicaragua, and Diaz Cannel’s Cuba, which supported Putin during the rebellion.
A strategic alliance exists between Russia and illiberal left-wing regimes in Latin America. Russia has also deployed military equipment, troops, and mercenaries to Venezuela, including members of the Wagner Group. It has deployed S-300 Air Defense systems and provided hundreds of military advisors. Russia has also sent Tupolev Tu-160 nuclear bombers to Venezuela and Nicaragua. In Nicaragua, the Ortega regime authorized 180-230 Russian troops, aircraft, ships and weapons to operate on its soil. Likewise, Russian troops have been trained in Nicaragua and Venezuela.
Thus, as part of this alliance, it makes sense that Putin would try to offer similar deals to Maduro and Ortega to recruit more soldiers.
Putin’s stubbornness is not likely to lead to an end of the conflict any time soon. Casualties will multiply, and increasingly authoritarian Latin American regimes might sacrifice their sons to a senseless war and indefinitely prolong it.
Luis Fleischman, PhD, is co-founder of the Palm Beach Center for Democracy & Policy Research, professor of Social Sciences at Palm Beach State College and the author of the book Latin American in the Post-Chavez Era: A Threat to U.S. Security .
About Luis Fleischman
About the Author

Luis Fleischman
CO-FOUNDER, CONTRIBUTOR AND BOARD MEMBER
Luis Fleischman, Ph.D is a professor of Sociology at Palm Beach State College. He served as Vice-President of the Jewish Community Relations Council of the Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County, and as a Latin America expert at the Washington DC –Menges Hemispheric Project (Center for Security Policy)
Related Articles
Resuming The Debate over The Muslim Brotherhood in United States
Members of the MB were caught planning sabotage activities in Amman. Jordan’s interior minister Mazin al-Farrayeh, declared a total ban on the group in a press briefing, saying that “any activity by the group, regardless of its nature, is considered a violation of the law”. He also emphasized that “affiliation and any interaction with the group is now banned and that promotion of its & ‘ ideology ‘ will result in criminal prosecution.”
The ‘Deep State’ May Not Be As Bad – OpEd
The term “deep state” has been repeatedly heard since Donald Trump was first elected president in 2016. In this view, the “deep state” has been interpreted to mean the federal agencies of the executive branch composed of unelected bureaucrats standing in the way of presidential policies.
Bombing the Houthis Is a Good Start, but a Successful Strategy Must Be Broader
The U.S. Campaign Must Combine Military Force, Aggressive Diplomacy, Economic Warfare, and Influence Operations

The Center is a gathering of scholars, experts and community stakeholders, that engage in research and dialogue in an effort to create practical policy recommendations and solutions to current local, national, and international challenges.
EXPLORE THE CENTER
FOCUS AREAS
©2025 The Palm Beach Center for Democracy and Policy Research. All Rights Reserved