The Middle East Riddle: A Study of the Middle East Peace Process and Israeli-Arab Relations in Changing Times
Photo by Benjamin Rascoe on Unsplash
The Middle East Riddle: A Study of the Middle East Peace Process and Israeli-Arab Relations in Changing Times
By Luis Fleischman
Fleischman makes a compelling argument that an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement requires the cooperation of Arab states. He also argues for Jordanian-West Bank and Egypt- Gaza federations.
Hatred of Israel, Fleischman contends, is so ingrained among Palestinians that no bilateral agreement is possible. On the other side, he criticizes Israeli settlement policy on the West Bank, presenting it, too, as another obstacle to peace, but less so than Palestinian hostility.
Changes in Arabic-speaking countries, especially the “Arab Spring” uprisings have meant a turn inwards and less concern with confronting Israel, as shown by the Abraham accords, which the author hopes can be a precursor to an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement facilitated by the Arab states. However, he never actually explains how the Arab states might accomplish this but assumes it as a given.
While Middle East Riddle contains much of value, depending on Jordan and Egypt to resume their old roles is problematic. Would Jordan’s King Abdullah II want to federate with the West Bank? A highly problematic history presumably accounts for his showing no inclination whatsoever to return to the 1948-67 era. Likewise, Egypt’s Abdel Fatah Sisi came to power in 2013 via a military coup that ousted the Muslim Brotherhood regime; but a federation with Gaza would legitimize Hamas. In addition, Hamas has smuggled arms to the ISIS subsidiary fighting the Egyptian government in the Sinai Peninsula.
In sum, while Fleischman makes good points, his suggestion to solve the Israeli-Palestinian conflict through federations between Jordan and the West Bank and Egypt and Gaza appears unrealistic.
.
About Luis Fleischman
About the Author

Luis Fleischman
CO-FOUNDER, CONTRIBUTOR AND BOARD MEMBER
Luis Fleischman, Ph.D is a professor of Sociology at Palm Beach State College. He served as Vice-President of the Jewish Community Relations Council of the Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County, and as a Latin America expert at the Washington DC –Menges Hemispheric Project (Center for Security Policy)
Related Articles
Resuming The Debate over The Muslim Brotherhood in United States
Members of the MB were caught planning sabotage activities in Amman. Jordan’s interior minister Mazin al-Farrayeh, declared a total ban on the group in a press briefing, saying that “any activity by the group, regardless of its nature, is considered a violation of the law”. He also emphasized that “affiliation and any interaction with the group is now banned and that promotion of its & ‘ ideology ‘ will result in criminal prosecution.”
The ‘Deep State’ May Not Be As Bad – OpEd
The term “deep state” has been repeatedly heard since Donald Trump was first elected president in 2016. In this view, the “deep state” has been interpreted to mean the federal agencies of the executive branch composed of unelected bureaucrats standing in the way of presidential policies.
Bombing the Houthis Is a Good Start, but a Successful Strategy Must Be Broader
The U.S. Campaign Must Combine Military Force, Aggressive Diplomacy, Economic Warfare, and Influence Operations

The Center is a gathering of scholars, experts and community stakeholders, that engage in research and dialogue in an effort to create practical policy recommendations and solutions to current local, national, and international challenges.
EXPLORE THE CENTER
FOCUS AREAS
©2025 The Palm Beach Center for Democracy and Policy Research. All Rights Reserved