The Crisis in Argentina could have Serious Regional Implications

September 1, 2022

Photo by Benjamin Rascoe on Unsplash

The Crisis in Argentina could have Serious Regional Implications

By Luis Fleischman 

Argentina’s Vice President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner was recently indicted on corruption charges. The prosecutor, Diego Luciani, charged her with being the head of an illegal association that benefitted from kickbacks from the government’s public works contracts. The accused include Ms. Kirchner, cabinet members linked to public works operations, and an individual who served as a front man for Kirchner. The prosecution asked for a 12-year jail sentence for the vice president and a lifetime ban on holding public office.  

Kirchner’s reaction came quickly. In a matter of hours following the prosecutor’s announcement, she delivered a speech to the nation delegitimizing the process, claiming the indictment was a political witch hunt. She also added that it was an attack not only against her, but also against everyone who supports her and the entire Peronist movement.  “This is a trial against a popular and nationalist government, against those who fight for public works, better pensions, and better salaries,” she claimed.

Sooner after, her entourage began a mass mobilization. Large demonstrations in support of the vice president ensued.  Five hundred city and county mayors signed a letter in support of Kirchner, claiming that the trial was a mechanism aimed at removing her forever from public life. The department of humanities (Filosofia y Letras) of the University of Buenos Aires denounced the “persecution against the vice president.” All echoed the same argument made by Ms. Kirchner. 

Kirchner resorted to a popular appeal and public opinion to delegitimize the state institutions that are the embodiment of democracy and constitutionalism. The division of powers and the independence of the judiciary is crucial in any democratic regime. Kirchner called the legal system “the judiciary party” openly implying that the judiciary was another opposition political party, one as destabilizing and treasonous as the “military party” throughout Argentina’s troubled authoritarian past. 

This was not the first time Kirchner has been concerned about the judiciary. 

When Alberto Fernandez, the president of Argentina hand-picked by Ms. Kirchner, took the reins of the government in 2019, he proceeded to accuse the judiciary of persecuting Ms. Kirchner through lawfare. President Fernandez also attempted to pack the judiciary with loyalists and even proceeded to remove three judges that were involved in cases against Kirchner. 

 Indeed, the vice president was absolved in three cases before the procedures even began.  

But events in Argentina are relevant beyond the country’s borders. 

The international Reaction to the Argentinean Current Crisis 

Several regional leaders issued a joint communique in support of Ms. Kirchner. Unsurprisingly, Mr. Fernandez issued a joint statement with the presidents of Mexico, Colombia and Bolivia criticizing the indictment of Ms. Kirchner as an “unjustified persecution” against her and arguing that it was motivated by their desire “to remove Kirchner from the public, political and electoral life and bury the values and ideas that she represents in order to impose a neo-liberal regime. ” The letter also demanded to respect the report of the United Nations special rapporteur that questioned the independence of Argentina’s judges involved in the legal cases involving the vice president. This strange document seems to reaffirm the perennial doubt about the objectivity and honesty of this international body.  

It is also astonishing that Mexican President Andrés Manuel Lopez Obrador, who insists on not meddling in the internal affairs of other countries, particularly in Venezuela, has done exactly that. What concerns Lopez Obrador is that another left-wing populist leader is being challenged. Colombian President Gustavo Petro likely shared those concerns. Therefore, anybody who has been under the illusion that Petro was going to be a pragmatist and loyal to the democratic system that enabled his election, will surely be disappointed. Most likely Petro will play a negative role in the region against the spirit of the democratic charter of the Organization of American States (OAS).

Curiously enough, Kirchner also received the backing of the leader of the French extreme left, Jean Luc Melenchon. Melenchon advocates for France’s withdrawal from NATO, has accused the alliance of trying to annex Ukraine to the West, and holds it responsible for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. 

Pablo Iglesias, the founder of the Spanish extreme left party “Podemos” and a strong supporter of the Venezuelan and Iranian regimes, traveled to Argentina to express solidarity with the vice president.  

It appears that Kirchner; the vice president of a relatively weak third-world country has become an international rallying symbol against liberal democracy. 

Of course, Ms. Kirchner should be presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty. However, attacks against the judiciary, mobilization of demonstrators, and the removal of investigating judges may encourage impunity and corruption. In addition, when these measures become role models or are supported by leaders of other countries, this becomes a dangerous security problem. Terrorists and drug traffickers are watching, and they certainly know how to take advantage of illegality and chaos. 

Anarchy and disarray is intense in countries such as Venezuela, Mexico, and most of Central America. In the specific case of Argentina, it will only be a matter of time before it turns into a similar country where criminal groups control large territories at the expense of the state.  In Argentina, a weak state legal structure failed to resolve two major terrorist attacks and the mysterious death of a prosecutor.   

Argentina could face a major growth in organized crime.  Large cartels don’t exist in Argentina yet, but organized crime is already present.  Organized crime and violence advance as the state recedes in Latin America, as Paula Romo, a former Ecuadorian cabinet member, recently pointed out. Countries that suppress or politicize their judicial systems are more likely to fall into destabilizing situations.  If the Argentinean system withdraws the charges against Kirchner before a fair trial is conducted by an independent judiciary, it would be a step forward in this perverse direction.

.

About Luis Fleischman

Luis Fleischman is a professor of Sociology at Palm Beach State College, the co-founder of the think-tank the Palm Beach Center for Democracy and Policy Research. He is also the author of “Latin America in the Post-Chavez Era: The Threat to U.S. Security,” and the author of the book, “The Middle East Riddle: The Arab-Israeli Conflict in Light of Political and Social Transformations in the Arab World,” to be published by New Academia.”

 

 

About the Author

Luis Fleischman

Luis Fleischman

CO-FOUNDER, CONTRIBUTOR AND BOARD MEMBER

Luis Fleischman, Ph.D is a professor of Sociology at Palm Beach State College. He served as Vice-President of the Jewish Community Relations Council of the Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County, and as a Latin America expert at the Washington DC –Menges Hemispheric Project (Center for Security Policy)

Related Articles

The Columbia University Encampment, Joseph Massad, and the Future of Campus Antisemitism

The spectacle of a mass antizionist and antisemitic “Gaza Solidarity Encampment” on Columbia University’s central quad and elsewhere has structural predecessors, to be sure, like the Occupy Wall Street movement, but parallels with mass antisemitism require comparison with earlier historical moments. The Occupy Wall Street movement was notably accompanied by a substantial body of theoretical work, whereas the Columbia occupation is supported by little more than a Manichean view of a world divided between oppressor and oppressed peoples.

The Obvious Truths about Free Speech Protests

Free speech is worse than messy. It is unruly, annoying, chaotic, unsightly, loud and intrusive. It is full of individuals who are uninformed or misinformed, full of statements of exaggeration and hyperbole, many crude and false, and taken together, too often bothersome, irritating, overblown, and endlessly repetitive.

[fts_twitter twitter_name=@pbdemocracy tweets_count=6 cover_photo=yes stats_bar=no show_retweets=no show_replies=no]

The Center is a gathering of scholars, experts and community stakeholders, that engage in research and dialogue in an effort to create practical policy recommendations and solutions to current local, national, and international challenges.

©2019 The Palm Beach Center for Democracy and Policy Research. All Rights Reserved