In Iran, Women Are the Answer
Photo by Freepik
In Iran, Women Are the Answer
With Assistance From the West, Women’s Movements Can Become a Cornerstone of a More Democratic and Prosperous Iran
By Eric Navarro
From: www.meforum.org
After the latest Iranian missile attack on Israel, a significant Israeli retaliation is a certainty. This situation is fraught with risks of escalation and widespread global impact. In the face of these dangers, Western policymakers should explore strategic approaches to drive change in the Islamic Republic.
The expected Israeli strikes will be a near-term blow to the Iranian regime; however, the aftermath presents a target to exploit for long-term impact. A weakened regime can be further undermined if the United States and its allies conduct an aggressive influence and covert support campaign focusing on one of Iran’s most powerful constituencies: its women.
For more than four decades, Iran’s ruling clerics have maintained control through suppression, including the subjugation of women. This oppression creates a critical vulnerability; the regime has transformed half of its population into a potential source of resistance and social transformation. As Sun Tzu famously observed, “In war, the way is to avoid what is strong and strike at what is weak.” The disenfranchisement of women represents a substantial weakness in Iran’s social fabric. Having endured systematic discrimination for years, women are primed for influence narratives that call for empowerment and liberation. This approach would turn the regime’s oppressive energy inward, leading to internal destabilization and, potentially, its collapse.
Iranian women long have played a critical role in their society, from their participation in the 1979 revolution to their enduring resistance of religious and legal repression. They have proven their resilience and influence against the regime’s constraints. Their cultural presence and activism, despite grave personal risks, present a potent counterforce to the regime’s power.
A comprehensive strategy to empower Iranian women would begin with covert support to grassroots movements. Many women’s groups exist in Iran, yet they often lack the resources needed to organize and operate effectively. The U.S. can provide financial support, resources for secure communication, and logistical aid to help these movements grow without appearing as overt foreign interference.
Media play a crucial role in amplifying the voices of Iranian women. Digital platforms transcend borders and can magnify these voices, creating global awareness and rallying international support. U.S.-supported media outlets, such as Radio Farda and Voice of America, can highlight the struggles and resistance of Iranian women while galvanizing the diaspora to spread their stories across networks.
Cultural diplomacy is another powerful tool. Programs such as international scholarships, cultural exchanges, and leadership development initiatives can foster a generation of empowered Iranian women who are even more resilient to the regime’s influence. These programs should teach the skills necessary for leadership, organization, and resistance, fortifying a future opposition movement.
A predictable response from the regime to increased activism by women is heightened repression. Historically, crackdowns often have backfired, further alienating key segments of the population. By escalating violence and punishment against women activists, the regime risks widening its legitimacy gap—not just among women but across broader society.
The U.S. must ensure that the momentum generated by women’s movements becomes self-sustaining. The U.S. should provide early-stage support, with a goal of cultivating a domestic movement capable of growing independently. This would increase the movement’s credibility in Iran and make it more difficult for the regime to dismantle it. A decentralized, locally led movement becomes much harder to suppress, particularly when a large portion of the population deeply feels the grievances.
Any attempt to influence internal affairs in Iran carries risks. The regime may retaliate not only against women’s movements but also against U.S. interests in the region. However, the U.S. can mitigate these risks through careful diplomacy. The U.S. must maintain plausible deniability in its covert support, ensuring that its involvement remains discreet and does not provoke direct confrontation with the regime.
Internationally, the U.S. can work with allies to isolate Iran diplomatically and economically, applying pressure in response to the regime’s human rights abuses. Sanctions targeting individuals, paired with diplomatic outreach, can create leverage without escalating into full-scale conflict.
Empowering Iranian women represents one of the most innovative ways to effect change in Tehran. By turning the regime’s oppression against it, the U.S. can exploit a critical vulnerability. The U.S. and its allies must embrace this opportunity. Doing so will lay the groundwork for a future in which women’s empowerment is a cornerstone of a more democratic and prosperous Iran. In the long term, enabling Iranian women to play a central role in shaping a democratic society offers the potential for a more stable and peaceful Middle East.
About the Author

Eric Navarro
CONTRIBUTOR
Eric Navarro is a lieutenant colonel in the United States Marine Corps Reserve and a graduate of the National War College.
Related Articles
The Power of Anti-Zionism in the United States: A Gradual Hegemony Building
Building on Antonio Gramsci’s framework, this paper analyzes the hegemonic
consolidation that has led to the emergence of a strong anti-Zionist historic bloc.
It reinterprets the notion of a historic bloc not through the traditional Marxist
perspective of class hegemony, but rather through the prevalence of a resolute
Palestinian narrative.
When Academic Freedom Becomes Weaponised: The Normalisation of Antisemitic Expression in British Academia
Amira Halperin and Stephen Sussman argue that institutional neutrality within universities can function as a mechanism of avoidance, and how legal protections for speech are being invoked to justify inaction.
In the wake of the 7 October 2023 Hamas attacks against Israel, university campuses across Britain have become sites of intense conflict over Israel, Gaza, Zionism, and antisemitism. Campus protests and confrontations have raised difficult questions about the boundaries between protected political expression and conduct that intimidates, excludes, or discriminates against Jewish and Israeli students and faculty.
The Strait of Hormuz Crisis and the Limits of Iranian Coercion
With the 60-day U.S.-Iran negotiating period now expired and the two sides still far apart, the Strait of Hormuz remains at the center of the confrontation. Traffic through one of the world’s most important energy corridors remains a fraction of prewar levels, while Washington and Tehran continue to disagree fundamentally over the terms under which normal navigation would resume. The immediate dispute raises a larger strategic question: can Tehran use control over a critical international waterway to compel a change in American strategy?
The Center is a gathering of scholars, experts and community stakeholders, that engage in research and dialogue in an effort to create practical policy recommendations and solutions to current local, national, and international challenges.
EXPLORE THE CENTER
FOCUS AREAS
©2025 The Palm Beach Center for Democracy and Policy Research. All Rights Reserved