Can New US Measures Topple Maduro?

April 17, 2020

Photo by Carolina Cabral/Getty Images
From: www.newsmax.com

Can New US Measures Topple Maduro?.

U.S.-Venezuela policy makers have been busy. On March 24, in a rare move against foreign leaders, the Justice Department (DOJ) accused Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and 13 members of his entourage of drug trafficking and terrorism and requested Maduro’s capture.

A $15-million reward was offered to anybody who would bring about Maduro’s arrest.

On March 31, the Trump administration proposed a plan to lift the sanctions on Venezuela if a transitional government is formed, that would include members of the government — and the opposition.

This proposed five-member transitional government should eventually give way to a transition to a full democracy. The plan requires that neither Maduro nor opposition leader Juan Guaido, be part of this transitional government.

Guaido accepted the plan.

Some U.S. officials believe that these new steps may produce a new set of uprisings against the regime, especially given Venezuelan attorney general’s summoning of Juan Guaido for allegedly attempting a coup against Maduro.

Others bet on the idea that Maduro may be betrayed by his entourage given the current coronavirus; plummeting oil prices dropping to unprecedented levels; the heavy sanctions imposed, and the U.S. Justice Department’s recent decision.

Yet — it’s difficult to predict, and less so to guarantee, that the Maduro regime will fall as a result of recent U.S. measures.

Neither the Justice Department’s decision nor U.S sanctions are immune to manipulation.

That has been made clear by China and Russia.

Take Russian oil giant Rosneft’s announcement that it is abandoning Venezuela, apparently as a result of U.S. sanctions and maybe that the DOJ’s recent charges — basically prompting Venezuela to act as a terrorist state — made them uncomfortable.

However, the reality is that Roseneft sold all its assets in Venezuela to an unnamed company owned by the Russian government. This means that Russia will continue to be involved in the survival of the Venezuelan oil industry and will continue to support Maduro.

Such a well-planned move by Russia requires immediate action by the United States.

The U.S. government must proceed to impose sanctions on this new company or on any company attempting to involved in the Venezuelan oil industry with the purpose of saving the Maduro regime.

This is also why the U.S. should allow American companies currently operating in Venezuela to continue to do so, thereby protecting their assets from a potential Russian takeover if they leave.

Their exit would have no impact in ending the Maduro regime and their presence is instrumental for the massive reconstruction efforts needed in Venezuela.

The harsh reality is that Maduro is a stubborn dictator like his mentors from Havana.

In my view, he is not likely to abandon the reins of power.

And, so far, popular uprisings, U.S. and international sanctions, coronavirus, and criminalization of the leadership have not brought about the downfall of the regime.

Therefore, it’s also important to consider other options.

Last week, Roger Noriega, former assistant Secretary of State for the Western Hemisphere, recommended something I had proposed in the past; a naval blockade to intercept drug and gold contraband.

I would add perhaps that such a naval blockade and no-fly zone is important to prevent Russian and Chinese ships and planes from providing help to the regime.

Another option could be to arm the opposition.

In Afghanistan, U.S. help to opposition forces was key to removing the Soviets from the country. Afghanistan may not be perceived as a success story because it ultimately empowered al-Qaida. However, the Venezuelan opposition is not al-Qaida, and the strategy in Afghanistan at least managed to remove the Soviets.

We all hope Trump’s new plan works out peacefully. However, we also need to think about what happens if such a plan does not work out.

The Justice Department’s decision, declaring Venezuelan leadership narco-terrorists, has acknowledged that the Venezuelan State is an enemy.

Therefore, the Trump administration should think seriously about helping opposition forces topple Nicolas Maduro’s brutal, corrupt regime without a direct military intervention.

Forcing America’s exit from Venezuela will only strengthen Maduro’s hold and allow totalitarian regimes such as Cuba, Russia and others, to gain a powerful foothold in this struggling nation.

 

About Luis Fleischman

Luis Fleischman is a professor of Sociology at Palm Beach State College, the co-founder of the think-tank the Palm Beach Center for Democracy and Policy Research. He is also the author of “Latin America in the Post-Chavez Era: The Threat to U.S. Security,” and the author of a forthcoming book, “The Middle East Riddle: The Arab-Israeli Conflict in Light of Political and Social Transformations in the Arab World,” to be published by New Academia.”

 

 

About the Author

Luis Fleischman

Luis Fleischman

CO-FOUNDER, CONTRIBUTOR AND BOARD MEMBER

Luis Fleischman, Ph.D is a professor of Sociology at Palm Beach State College. He served as Vice-President of the Jewish Community Relations Council of the Jewish Federation of Palm Beach County, and as a Latin America expert at the Washington DC –Menges Hemispheric Project (Center for Security Policy)

Related Articles

Despite Difficult Choices, Defeating Hamas Is the Only Path Towards Israeli-Palestinian Peace

Last weekend was a very tragic one for Israelis and Jews, as the IDF discovered the bodies of six hostages executed by Hamas in order to prevent them from being rescued and returned home.

The murder of the hostages triggered demonstrations against the Israeli government, which were further aggravated by Prime Minister Netanyahu’s speech delivered a day after the murders where he reaffirmed the need to control the Philadelphi Corridor. The Corridor is a strip of land approximately 8.5 miles long between Gaza and Egypt, which has been used to smuggle weapons, personnel, and equipment to Hamas for years.

The Supreme Court’s Landmark Decision in Trump v. United States: Affirming Presidential Immunity and Separation of Powers

The Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. United States 603 US _ (2024) is a landmark ruling with far-reaching implications for the doctrine of Separation of Powers and the scope of presidential immunity. The case centered on former President Donald Trump’s claim that he should be immune from criminal prosecution for actions taken during his presidency.

[fts_twitter twitter_name=@pbdemocracy tweets_count=6 cover_photo=yes stats_bar=no show_retweets=no show_replies=no]

The Center is a gathering of scholars, experts and community stakeholders, that engage in research and dialogue in an effort to create practical policy recommendations and solutions to current local, national, and international challenges.

©2019 The Palm Beach Center for Democracy and Policy Research. All Rights Reserved